Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1303

reference
635-tree-1
name
1303
tree-preservation-order

undefined

635-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.047209 50.866982)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.047138 50.866974,-1.047141 50.866988,-1.047151 50.867001,-1.047167 50.867011,-1.047186 50.867017,-1.047208 50.867020,-1.047230 50.867018,-1.047250 50.867011,-1.047266 50.867001,-1.047276 50.866989,-1.047280 50.866975,-1.047277 50.866961,-1.047267 50.866949,-1.047252 50.866939,-1.047232 50.866932,-1.047210 50.866930,-1.047188 50.866932,-1.047168 50.866938,-1.047152 50.866948,-1.047142 50.866960,-1.047138 50.866974)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL